In a field experiment

By Bruno S. Frey, Stephan Meier. 2004

416 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afa0a1312c3b8db7e47fa1dfd2b6957815603f5e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The behavioural economics of climate change (2008, background): “For example, Frey and Meier (2004) analysed the behaviour of students in Zurich who had the opportunity to contribute to two social funds every semester, and found that they gave higher contributions after being informed that many other students were contributing.”
Neighbors, Knowledge, and Nuggets: Two Natural Field Experiments on the Role of Incentives on Energy Conservation (2013, unknown): “…by economists mainly in energy and water use (Ayers et al., 2009; Costa & Kahn, 2010; Allcott, 2011; Ferraro & Price, 2013), charitable giving (Frey & Meier, 2004; Croson & Shang, 2008), voting (Gerber & Rogers, 2009), retirement savings (Duflo & Saez, 2003; Beshears et al., 2009), job…”
Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica (2008, background): “Frey and Meier (2004) analyzed the behavior of students in Zurich who had the opportunity to contribute to two social funds every semester.”
Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment (2007, unknown): “…experiments that explore other aspects of the economics of charity have also witnessed a nice surge, and include, but are not limited to, Bruno Frey and Meier (2004), Jen Shang and Rachel Croson (2005), Catherine C. Eckel and Phillip J. Grossman (2006), Armin Falk (forth-coming), and Craig…”
Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature (2011, background): “Nevertheless, the evidence cited by Frey and Meier (2004), Gächter (2007), Ostrom (1990) and Ostrom et al. (1994) and Ostrom’s being awarded the 2009 Nobel memorial prize in economics suggests a renewed and wider interest in policy implications of these findings.35 I think that the phenomenon of…”
Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review (2020, background): “Informal and face-to-face communication [65, 140, 141, 195, 212, 232]”
Charitable Intent: A Moral or Social Construct? A Revised Theory of Planned Behavior Model (2011, background): “In addition, field experiments have shown that individuals are more willing to give if they know that others are giving as well (e.g., Frey and Meier 2004; Croson and Shang 2008; Martin and Randal 2008), a phenomenon known as ‘conditional cooperation’.”
Heterogeneous Social Preferences and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods (2006, background): “…shape the tendency to follow a leader's example in team work (Gächter and Renner 2004; Güth, Levati, Sutter, and van der Heijden 2004; Potters, Sefton and Vesterlund 2004), and others' actions might also govern contributions to charity (e.g., Falk 2004; Frey and Meier 2004; Shang and Croson 2005).”
Mixed feelings: Theories of and evidence on giving (2010, background): “Specific gifts vary greatly, though, and are sensitive to context and framing effects as demonstrated in the laboratory by List (2007) and in the field by Alpizar, Carlsson and Johansson-Stenman (2008) and Frey and Meier (2004), among others.”
What Motivates Common Pool Resource Users? Experimental Evidence from the Field (2009, unknown): “Interestingly, Bardsley (2000) and Frey and Meier (2004) have called for the need to distinguish conformity from reciprocity.”
Design of Stated Preference Surveys: Is There More to Learn from Behavioral Economics? (2010, background): “…Andreoni and Petrie 2004; Legget et al. 2003; List et al. 2004), information about what others do (Bardsley and Sausgruber 2005; Carlsson et al. 2008; Frey and Meier 2004; Shang and Croson 2006), and the characteristics of the interviewer/solicitor (Bateman and Mawby 2004; Landry et al. 2006).”
Social Norms and Energy Conservation (2011, background): “More broadly, the program was motivated by similar evidence on the power of social norms in a variety of domains, including voting (Gerber and Rogers, 2009), retirement savings (Beshears et al., 2009), and charitable giving (Frey and Meier, 2004).”