Intergroup Aggression in Primates and Humans: The Case for a Unified Theory

By Margaret C. Crofoot, R. Wrangham. 2010

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af79762bc74a1c2901497cfbaab174fff1b13b6e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. M. Wilson
2. R. Wrangham
3. Luke Glowacki
4. John C. Mitani
5. Martin N. Muller
6. Sonya M. Kahlenberg
7. David P Watts
8. Monica L. Wakefield

In Social Psychology

1. M. Wilson
2. R. Wrangham
3. Luke Glowacki
4. John C. Mitani
5. Martin N. Muller
6. Sonya M. Kahlenberg
7. David P Watts
8. Monica L. Wakefield

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Luke Glowacki
2. M. Wilson
3. R. Wrangham

Citations in the corpus

• Ecological and social factors affect the occurrence and outcomes of intergroup encounters in chimpanzees (2012, unknown): “Important potential benefits include increased access to food (Mosser & Packer 2009; Crofoot & Wrangham 2010), water (Wrangham 1981), sleeping sites (Anderson 1984) andmates (Emlen & Oring 1977).”
• The evolutionary anthropology of war (2017, background): “Because intergroup dominance provides reproductive benefits to members of successful groups, individuals are motivated to achieve dominance in intergroup contests (Crofoot and Wrangham, 2010).”