High connectivity among habitats precludes the relationship between dispersal and range size in tropical reef fishes

By Camilo Mora, Eric A. Treml, J. M. Roberts, K. Crosby, D. Roy, Derek P. Tittensor. 2012

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Th e hypothesis that pelagic larval duration (PLD) infl uences range size in marine species with a benthic adult stage and a pelagic larval period is intuitively attractive; yet, studies conducted to date have failed to support it. A possibility for the lack of a relationship between PLD and range size may stem from the failure of past studies to account for the eff ect of species evolutionary ages, which may add to the dispersal capabilities of species. However, if dispersal over ecological (i.e. PLD) and across evolutionary (i.e. species evolutionary age) time scales continues to show no eff ect on range size then an outstanding question is why? Here we collected data on PLD, evolutionary ages and range sizes of seven tropical fi sh families (fi ve families were reef-associated and two have dwell demersal habitats) to explore the independent and interactive eff ects of PLD and evolutionary age on range size. Separate analyses on each family showed that even after controlling for evolutionary age, PLD has an insignifi cant or a very small eff ect on range size. To shed light on why dispersal has such a limited eff ect on range size, we developed a global ocean circulation model to quantify the connectivity among tropical reefs relative to the potential dispersal conferred by PLD. We found that although there are several areas of great isolation in the tropical oceans, most reef habitats are within the reach of most species given their PLDs. Th ese results suggest that the lack of habitat isolation can potentially render the constraining eff ect of dispersal on range size insignifi cant and explain why dispersal does not relate to range size in reef fi shes.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af7914bcf9d5153b5c3944d989547355cb06b79f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. M. Gaither
  2. Brian W. Bowen
  3. J. C. Briggs
  4. P. Cowman
  5. Cynthia Riginos
  6. L. Liggins
  7. W. Ludt
  8. R. Toonen

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Brian W. Bowen
  2. M. Gaither
  3. Cynthia Riginos
  4. L. Liggins
  5. E. Hernández‐García
  6. E. Ser‐Giacomi
  7. Marie Beger
  8. Eric A. Treml

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. J. C. Briggs
  2. M. Gaither
  3. R. Toonen
  4. S. Arnaud-Haond
  5. E. Ser‐Giacomi
  6. Marie Beger
  7. Eric A. Treml
  8. Sean R. Connolly

Citations in the corpus