Environmental influence on transmitter detection probability in biotelemetry: developing a general model of acoustic transmission

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Importance of environmental and biological drivers in the presence and space use of a reef‑associated shark (2014, result): “However, it is possible that longer periods of high wind speed may have reduced the ability of the receivers to detect some sharks, as has been reported in other studies (Hobday & Pincock 2012, Gjelland & Hedger 2013, Udyawer et al. 2013).”
Environmental interference factors affecting detection range in acoustic telemetry studies using fixed receiver arrays (2014, unknown): “Diel cycles in detections have been observed elsewhere and attributed to biological noise and wind (Payne et al. 2010, Gjelland & Hedger 2013, Koeck et al. 2013), but significant diel cycles were not detected in our study or on a shallow reef in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia (Welsh et al. 2012).”