Agglomeration and the spatial distribution of creativity

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The territorial dynamics of innovation: a Europe-United States Comparative Analysis (2007, background): “…increases innovative output even after controlling for differences in human capital, high-tech industry structure and R&D university infrastructure, both in the US (Carlino et al. 2004; Sedgley and Elmslie 2004) and in some EU countries (e.g. Andersson et al. 2005, for the case of Sweden).”
Density and Creativity in U.S. Regions (2008, background): “More recently, density has become a topic of increasing interest to scholars studying the geographic factors that influence regional innovation and growth (Ciccone and Hall 1996; Carlino, Chaterjee, and Hunt 2001, 2007; Sedgely and Elmslie 2004; Andersson, Quigley, and Wilhelmsson 2005; Strumsky, ”
Mountains in a flat world: Why proximity still matters for the location of economic activity (2008, background): “1992; Henderson 1999) and Jacobian externalities (Andersson et al. 2005; Carlino et al. 2001; Feldman and Audretsch 1999) may play an important role in fostering innovation either in different industrial contexts or at different phases of a product life cycle.”
How does industry specialization affect the efficiency of regional innovation systems? (2010, background): “Feldman and Audretsch (1999) analyzed the effect of industry specialization on innovative output on the basis of innovation counts, which were attributed to four-digit SIC industries at the city level.”