EFFECTS OF GRAZING ON MICROBIAL FUNCTIONAL GROUPS INVOLVED IN SOIL N DYNAMICS

By A. Patra, L. Abbadie, A. Clays-Josserand, V. Degrange, S. Grayston, P. Loiseau, F. Louault, S. Mahmood, S. Nazaret, L. Philippot and 4 more. 2005

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An integrated perspective to explain nitrogen mineralization in grazed ecosystems (2013, unknown): “…animal ha−1 38 + MEDIUM 28 na + 24 1–16 7.2–7.3 361 4.5 Frank et al. (2000) Temp. grassland 0.3 animal ha−1 38 + MEDIUM na na + Na na 7.6–7.7 361 4.5 24 Patra et al. (2005) Temp. grassland na 13 + MEDIUM na na na na 3–5 5.5–5.7 770 8 25 Tracy and Frank (1998) Temp. grassland na 36 0/+ MEDIUM 23…”
Soil enzyme and microbial activities in a grazing ecosystem of Patagonian Monte, Argentina (2011, background): “This may be explained by the inhibition of protease synthesis or changes in soil microorganism composition associated with the local N-urine input from animals (Nunan et al., 2006; Patra et al., 2005).”
Grazing triggers soil carbon loss by altering plant roots and their control on soil microbial community (2009, background): “However, in some cases, grazing has been shown to affect soil microbial communities before plant communities, suggesting that the shift in ecosystem functioning is not necessarily caused by a change in plant litter quality (Patra et al. 2005).”
Several components of global change alter nitrifying and denitrifying activities in an annual grassland (2006, methodology): “We measured DEA (Smith & Tiedje 1979; modified by Patra et al. 2005) at soil pH over a short period by making all factors affecting denitrification nonlimiting.”