Self-similarity in species-area relationship and in species abundance distribution
By Salvador Pueyo. 2006
48 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af38015f5795ea02f77dd5d7179f0887b3d27683
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- A meta-analysis of species-abundance distributions (2010, methodology): “Lastly, power law SADs have been generated from fractal (Moulliot et al. 2000, Pueyo 2006) or Galton-Watson branching processes (Nee 2003).”
- Which function describes the species–area relationship best? A review and empirical evaluation (2009, background): “MacArthur & Wilson, 1967; Lomolino & Weiser, 2001; Whittaker & Fernández-Palacios, 2007), species abundance distributions (e.g. Preston, 1962; May, 1975; Harte et al., 1999; Ovaskainen & Hanski, 2003; Šizling & Storch, 2004; Williamson & Gaston, 2005; Pueyo, 2006) and neutral models (Bell, 2001; Hub”
- Latitudinal phytoplankton distribution and the neutral theory of biodiversity (2013, background): “…2006; Chust et al., 2006a), but since then they have also been applied in marine ecology (e.g. Dornelas et al., 2006; Martiny et al., 2011) and more specifically to planktonic species assemblages (Alonso et al., 2006; Pueyo, 2006a,b; Dolan et al., 2007; Vergnon et al., 2009; Irigoien et al., 2011).”