Finite element methods in linear poroelasticity: theoretical and computational results
By Mary F. Wheeler, P. Phillips. 2005
54 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af26b41bfa389f6fed6fc4805db758ccd2b83a84
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Chad M. Landis
- Nikolaos Bouklas
- Guangri Xue
- Rui Huang
- Ivan Yotov
- Son-Young Yi
- A. Abdollahi
- Natarajan Sukumar
Citations in the corpus
- Coupling multipoint flux mixed finite element methodswith continuous Galerkin methods for poroelasticity (2013, methodology): “This problem was studied in [27, 35] for a fluid saturated bracket using the system of poroelasticity (2.”
- A nonlinear, transient finite element method for coupled solvent diffusion and large deformation of hydrogels (2015, methodology): “This issue may be resolved by pressure stabilization schemes or use of discontinuous approximations (for chemical potential) as proposed by others for similar problems in poroelasticity (Hughes et al., 1986; Wan, 2002; Phillips, 2005; Phillips and Wheeler, 2009).”
- A coupling of nonconforming and mixed finite element methods for Biot's consolidation model (2013, background): “Phillips and Wheeler [28] heuristically examined the reasons for locking in poroelasticity.”