Is the mind really modular
By J. Prinz. 2005
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aef4e01e71a8a5bffced98630a912cd01c0ca452
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Martin Palecek
- Michael L. Anderson
- Eric Mandelbaum
- Vittorio Gallese †
- Stephen C. Levinson
- Dennis Patterson
- Alvin I. Goldman
- Tom Froese
Citations in the corpus
- Modularity of Mind (2017, background): “In response, proponents of a more general purpose mind have developed alternative accounts of learning and related cognitive functions (Eliasmith 2014; Prinz 2006; 2012).”
- The Massive Redeployment Hypothesis and the Functional Topography of the Brain (2007, background): “…2002; Zola-Morgan, 1995); the modularity hypothesis, massive or otherwise (e.g., Carruthers, 2003, 2005, 2006; Fodor, 1983, 2000; Pinker, 2005; Prinz, 2005; Sperber, 2002); the organization of other well-studied brain regions (see, e.g., Bechtel, 2001; Dagher, Owen, Boecker, & Brooks, 1999);…”
- Seeing and Conceptualizing: Modularity and the Shallow Contents of Perception (2018, background): “So the quicker categorization happens, the worse it seems for 8 Categorizing strikes me (and others, see Prinz 2002) as sufficient for concepthood.”