A de facto Classification of Exchange Rate Regimes: A Methodological Note

By Eduardo Levy-Yeyati, Federico Sturzenegger, T. D. Tella. 2002

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aeee5a6048a388a813d3aae879aa2c600d5fc29b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Michel Beine
2. B. Candelon
3. Frédéric Docquier
4. Hillel Rapoport
5. Gordon H. Hanson
6. Simone Bertoli
7. Shiu‐Sheng Chen
8. Stavros Degiannakis *

Citations in the corpus

• CHOOSING (AND RENEGING ON) EXCHANGE RATE REGIMES (2006, unknown): “We have rerun all our regressions of the previous section using the classification of exchange rate regimes proposed by Levy-Yeyati and Sturzenegger (2003) and by Shambuagh (2003).”
• Liberalisation and stock market co-movement between emerging economies (2011, background): “Nevertheless, several authors (in particular Levi-Yeyati and Sturzenegger, 2003 ) have shown that some countries do not respect their commitments and have justified the use of de facto classifications .”