The Primacy of the Ingroup: The Interplay of Entitativity and Identification

By V. Yzerbyt, Emanuele Castano, J. Leyens, Maria Paola Paladino. 2000

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aee30f10f69ac9cd50523b2204db46ac6a2a8fe7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. J. Leyens
2. Jeroen Vaes
3. Maria Paola Paladino
4. Nick Haslam
5. S. Demoulin
6. R. Gaunt
7. V. Yzerbyt
8. Emanuele Castano

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jeroen Vaes
2. J. Leyens
3. Maria Paola Paladino
4. Nick Haslam
5. S. Demoulin
6. R. Gaunt
7. V. Yzerbyt
8. Emanuele Castano

Citations in the corpus

• Who may enter? The impact of in-group identification on in-group/out-group categorization (2002, background): “…of identification on categorization of facial stimuli adds to the list of other phenomena that are influenced by the level of identification, such as the perception of group homogeneity and the black sheep effect (for reviews, see Branscombe, Ellemers, Spears, & Doosje, 1999; Yzerbyt et al., 2000).”
• Emotional prejudice can lead to infra-humanisation (2004, background): “At a deeper level than stereotypes (Hegarty & Pratto, 2001; Leyens, Yzerbyt, & Schadron, 1994), essences are thought to explain differences between groups (Yzerbyt et al., 2000).”
• On a Folk Theory of Society: Children, Evolution, and Mental Representations of Social Groups (2001, background): “There is now a cottage industry exploring entitativity, the idea that groups are conceptualized as corporate individuals or entities (Campbell, 1958; Hamilton, Sherman, & Lickel, 1998; Yzerbyt, Castano, Leyens, & Paladino, 2000 ).”