Towards good practice guidelines for the contour method of residual stress measurement
By F. Hosseinzadeh, J. Kowal, P. John Bouchard. 2014
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Accurate measurement of residual stress in metallic components using the contour method relies on the achievement of a good quality cut, on the appropriate measurement of the deformed cut surface and on the robust analysis of the measured data. There is currently no published standard or code of practice for the contour method. As a first step towards such a standard, this study draws on research investigations addressing the three main steps in the method: how best to cut the specimens; how to measure the deformation contour of the cut surface; and how to analyse the data. Good practice guidance is provided throughout the text accompanied by more detailed observations and advice tabulated in Appendix.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aed2506c5775d53305540a2e993e3364d796f9e2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Mechanical Engineering
- Stewart W. Williams
- Filomeno Martina
- Paul A. Colegrove
- S. Terzi
- J. Meyer
- Blanka A. Szost
- M. Hofmann
- Matthew Roy
Citations in the corpus
- Residual stress of as-deposited and rolled wire+arc additive manufacturing Ti–6Al–4V components (2016, background): “The cutting strategy and restraint employed followed the best practices to mitigate cutting artefacts.([25]) The cut started from the top of the deposit and into the baseplate with the wire moving parallel to the part’s Y -axis.”