Bridging data-driven and model-based approaches for process fault diagnosis and health monitoring: A review of researches and future challenges

By Khaoula Tidriri, Nizar Chatti, Sylvain Verron, Teodor Tiplica. Annual Reviews in Control, 2016

354 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Fault Diagnosis and Health Monitoring (FD-HM) for modern control systems have been an active area of research over the last few years. Model-based FD-HM computational approaches have been extensively developed to detect and locate faults by considering logical or mathematical description of the monitored process. However, because of parametric, measurement and model uncertainties, applicable approaches that endeavor to locate faults with great accuracy are likely to give false alarms. Recently, many research works have been conducted in order to tackle this issue by making a tradeoff between accuracy and robustness during the fault detection phase. Due to the recent advances in sensor technology, computational capabilities and dedicated software/hardware interfaces, data-driven FD-HM approaches have demonstrated that highly accurate fault detection is possible when the system monitoring data for nominal and degraded conditions are available. Therefore, it seems that more than one approach is usually required for developing a complete robust fault detection and diagnosis tool. In this paper, the features of different model-based and data-driven approaches are investigated separately as well as the existing works that attempted to integrate both of them. In this latter context, there have been only few works published in the literature and hence reviewing and discussing them is strongly motivated by providing a good reference for those interested in developing hybrid approaches for FD-HM.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aec77d5b3b1e0df09df6235125cc433abe32eb5a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. Michele Dassisti
  2. Hervé Panetto
  3. Mario Lezoche
  4. Concetta Semeraro

Citations in the corpus