Effect of economic growth on CO2 emission in developing countries: Evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model
By Goodness C. Aye, Prosper E. Edoja. 2017
537 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract This study investigated the effect of economic growth on CO2 emission using the dynamic panel threshold framework. The analysis is based on data from a panel of 31 developing countries. The results indicate that economic growth has negative effect on CO2 emission in the low growth regime but positive effect in the high growth regime with the marginal effect being higher in the high growth regime. Thus our finding provides no support for the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis; rather a U-shaped relationship is established. Energy consumption and population were also found to exert positive and significant effect on CO2 emission. Including financial development indicator in the model did not change the conclusion about EKC hypothesis. Employing panel causality methods, there is evidence of significant causal relationship between CO2 emission, economic growth, energy consumption and financial development. The findings emphasize the need for transformation of low carbon technologies aimed at reducing emissions and sustainable economic growth. This may include energy efficiency and switch away from non-renewable energy to renewable energy.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aeb47a99afc45061256647095f6f76602e132618
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Citations in the corpus
- Environmental regulations an option: Asymmetry effect of environmental regulations on carbon emissions using non-linear ARDL (2018, methodology): “…extensively by verifying environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) (Lynch 2014; Barra and Zotti 2016; Phimphanthavong 2013) and rejecting EKC hypothesis by (Gill, Viswanathan, and Hassan 2018; Mert and Bozdağ 2014; Aye and Edoja 2017; Cederborg and Snöbohm 2016; Das Neves Almeida et al. 2017; Aşıcı 2013).”