Molecular Imaging: Looking at Problems, Seeing Solutions

By H. Herschman. Science, 2003

394 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Looking and listening to light: the evolution of whole-body photonic imaging (2005, methodology): “Whole-body fluorescence and bioluminescence imaging have transformed the ways gene expression and protein functions are visualized in vivo”
Nonnegative Least-Correlated Component Analysis for Separation of Dependent Sources by Volume Maximization (2010, neutral): “, multispectral microscopy, dual-energy X-ray imaging, dynamic functional imaging, and electroencephalogram or magnetoencephalogram (EEG/MEG) [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]).”
The Carnegie Protein Trap Library: A Versatile Tool for Drosophila Developmental Studies (2007, neutral): “Epitope tagging, enhancer trapping, and gene trapping all have the added advantage that gene expression can subsequently be observed in living tissues, revealing dynamic processes that are largely beyond the reach of methods based on fixed material (reviewed in Herschman 2003; Dirks and Tanke 2006).”
Nanotechnological applications in medicine. (2007, background): “Starting with single biomarkers as sine quo non for disease, initial successes in nanotechnology-enabled molecular imaging have been made in all imaging modalities including optical [8–10], nuclear [9,11], ultrasound [12,13], computed tomography (CT) [14,15 ], and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [1”