Cluster Identification Using Projections
By D. Pena, Francisco J. Prieto. 2001
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae71fa772c8f9a07270d825ec661d9471169c848
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Ricardo Fraiman
- Jari Miettinen
- Lutz Dümbgen
- Ana Justel
- Hannu Oja
- Marcela Svarc
- Klaus Nordhausen
- Frank Critchley
In Statistics and Probability
- Hannu Oja
- Sara Taskinen
- David E. Tyler
- Frank Critchley
- Klaus Nordhausen
- Lutz Dümbgen
- Ricardo Fraiman
- Jari Miettinen
Citations in the corpus
- Invariant co‐ordinate selection (2009, methodology): “Projection directions maximizing and minimizing kurtosis were shown to be useful for robust multivariate estimation in Pena and Prieto (2001b), who also proved the optimality properties of these directions for clustering (Pena and Prieto, 2001a).”
- Selection of Variables for Cluster Analysis and Classification Rules (2006, methodology): “(Kaufman and Rousseeuw 1987), but not the case of hierarchical clustering (Hartigan 1975) or kurtosis-based clustering (Peña and Prieto 2001).”
- Fourth Moments and Independent Component Analysis (2014, methodology): “The measure β has been used as an indicator of the bimodality, for example, in identifying clusters in the data set (Peña and Prieto, 2001) or as a general indicator for non-Gaussianity, for example, in testing for normality or in independent 372 component analysis (Hyvärinen, 1999).”