A Viewpoint on: Brain Organization into Resting State Networks Emerges at Criticality on a Model of the Human Connectome
By Dietmar Plenz, A. Haimovici, Enzo Tagliazucchi, Pablo Balenzuela, Dante R. Chialvo. 2013
241 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae716d8c5873a2975c9eace9bfa4dcee15f48c8b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Michael Breakspear
- Miguel Angel Muñoz
- Luca Cocchi
- Andrew Zalesky
- Leonardo L. Gollo
- Paolo Moretti
- Olaf Sporns
- D. Bassett
Citations in the corpus
- Colloquium: Criticality and dynamical scaling in living systems (2017, background): “This is consistent with the finding that e.g. models for brain activity reach highest signal complexity, with a variety of attractors and multistability when operating near criticality (Deco and Jirsa, 2012; Haimovici et al., 2013).”
- Criticality in the brain: A synthesis of neurobiology, models and cognition. (2017, background): “Among the most intriguing findings are the recapitulation of the classic resting-state networks (Yeo et al., 2011) by models of critical dynamics arising from primate (Honey et al., 2007) and human (Haimovici et al., 2013) structural connectomes.”
- Griffiths phases and the stretching of criticality in brain networks (2013, background): “In the context of neuroscience, synchronization patterns have been shown to exhibit broadband criticality [5], critical avalanches of spontaneous neural activity have been consistently found both in vitro [6–8] and in vivo [9], and results from large-scale brain models based on the human connectome ”