Improving research about us, with us: a draft framework for inclusive autism research

By Nick Chown, Jackie Robinson, Luke Beardon, Jillian Downing, L. Hughes, J. Leatherland, Katrina Fox, Laura Hickman, D. MacGregor. 2017

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract It is both epistemologically as well as ethically problematic if the autistic voice is not heard in relation to social scientific research seeking to further develop knowledge of autism. Ever since autism first emerged, it has remained medicalised and almost exclusively the preserve of non-autistic researchers. More recently, autistic individuals have begun to contribute to autism research. However, the vast majority of research in autism is still undertaken on autistic people, rather than with them, and is often not concerned with improving the day-to-day lives of people with autism. We discuss the concepts of participatory research and emancipatory research before presenting a draft framework for what we regard as truly inclusive research in autism. Our proposals are firmly based on ideas developed by the members of a university-based group of autistic adults (the Asperger’s Consultation Group) as well as the knowledge and experience of the other contributors.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae680f0e92914d9e17af9a94596cd6850f1aa124

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. K. Bottema‐Beutel
  2. Jessica Lester
  3. N. Sasson
  4. Brittany N. Hand
  5. Steven K. Kapp

Citations in the corpus