A review of research methods in entrepreneurship 1985-2013

By Seonaidh McDonald, Bee Ching Gan, Simon S. Fraser, A. Oke, Alistair R. Anderson. 2015

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to address the research questions: which methodologies and data gathering methods are employed by researchers publishing in top entrepreneurship journals, and how has this changed over time? Design/methodology/approach – The data gathering methods of research published in five top entrepreneurship journals between 1985 and 2013, a period of nearly three decades, were recorded. Findings – The data demonstrate that entrepreneurship research is dominated by positivist approaches and data gathering methods, but that this picture is changing over time. The data also reveal differences in methods used in research published in North American and European journals. Research limitations/implications – It is argued that increased discussion of the limitations, benefits and implications of research methods is needed across the field as a whole. It is concluded that although there is some methodological reflexivity in the field of a macro, abstract nature, there is little at the...

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae652c14c7d6e2b4ef247c23f2b98ab3e6eb1e36

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

  1. Fevzi Okumus

In Management of Technology and Innovation

  1. Ke-tsai Wu
  2. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu
  3. Fevzi Okumus
  4. Hui Fu

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

  1. Ke-tsai Wu
  2. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu
  3. Fevzi Okumus
  4. Hui Fu

Citations in the corpus