Powder Diffraction: Least-Squares and Beyond

By W. David. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2004

71 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper addresses some of the underlying statistical assumptions and issues in the collection and refinement of powder diffraction data. While standard data collection and Rietveld analysis have been extremely successful in providing structural information on a vast range of materials, there is often uncertainty about the true accuracy of the derived structural parameters. In this paper, we discuss a number of topics concerning data collection and the statistics of data analysis. We present a simple new function, the cumulative chi-squared distribution, for assessing regions of misfit in a diffraction pattern and introduce a matrix which relates the impact of individual points in a powder diffraction pattern with improvements in the estimated standard deviation of refined parameters. From an experimental viewpoint, we emphasise the importance of not over-counting at low-angles and the routine use of a variable counting scheme for data collection. Data analysis issues are discussed within the framework of maximum likelihood, which incorporates the current least-squares strategies but also enables the impact of systematic uncertainties in both observed and calculated data to be reduced.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae5d62826b923518691fb19c508e4649fef1a813

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

  1. S. Parsons
  2. Trixie Wagner
  3. H. Flack
  4. G. Sheldrick
  5. A. Coelho

In Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

  1. Trixie Wagner
  2. S. Parsons
  3. H. Flack

Citations in the corpus