The Two Faces of Globalization: Against Globalization as We Know it

By Branko Milanovic. 2003

343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae3fb98f1458b2257cbbf475e8e6c60422ffdfea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. M. Nissanke
2. Robin Broad
3. E. Thorbecke
4. A. Fosu

In Political Science and International Relations

1. M. Nissanke
2. Robin Broad
3. E. Thorbecke

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Nissanke
2. Robin Broad
3. E. Thorbecke
4. A. Fosu

Citations in the corpus

• Research, knowledge, and the art of ‘paradigm maintenance’: the World Bank's Development Economics Vice-Presidency (DEC) (2006, background): “The phrase ‘Knowledge Bank’ appears carefully chosen to imply openness and lack of bias—overall quality.”
• Globalisation and Poverty: How can Global Value Chain Research Inform the Policy Debate? (2004, neutral): “Strong arguments are put forward by those more sceptical of the inherent benefits of globalisation, that globalisation has resulted in sharply disparate gains across countries (Milanovic 2003).”
• The Social Impact of Globalization in the Developing Countries (2006, neutral): “Such reforms, in turn, often imply possible increases in within-country income inequality (Rodrik, 2000; Milanovic, 2003).”
• Channels and Policy Debate in the Globalization-Inequality-Poverty Nexus (2006, background): “…two decades The attempt to explain divergence of incomes by ‘eliminating’ the countries with ‘bad’ policies and focusing solely on those with ‘good’ policies is flawed because the successful countries, and China in particular, did not follow the orthodox economic advice (Milanovic 2003: 676).”