INCREMENTAL COSTS AND BENEFITS SHAPE NATAL DISPERSAL: THEORY AND EXAMPLE WITH HEMILEPISTUS REAUMURI

By Mitchell B Baker, S.T.V. Rao. 2004

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae29afe0941d1038f6e59b95a51c0cc8e4839fe3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. D. Bonte
2. H. Van Dyck
3. D. Marshall
4. C. Elkin
5. J. Clobert
6. Justin M. J. Travis
7. R. Swaisgood
8. T. Hovestadt

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. D. Bonte
2. Justin M. J. Travis
3. J. Clobert
4. T. Hovestadt
5. C. Elkin
6. D. Marshall
7. Calvin Dytham
8. S. C. Palmer

Citations in the corpus

• Desperate larvae: influence of deferred costs and habitat requirements on habitat selection (2007, background): “…models of habitat selection have demonstrated that decreasing selectivity is generally expected when the cost of searching (mortality, deferred search costs) is high and the relative benefit of settling in good vs. poor quality habitat is small (Ward 1987, Baker & Rao 2004, Stamps et al. 2005).”
• Modelling dispersal: an eco‐evolutionary framework incorporating emigration, movement, settlement behaviour and the multiple costs involved (2012, background): “More recently, Baker & Rao (2004) presented a model to explore settling behaviour in different habitats.”
• Multiple proximate and ultimate causes of natal dispersal in white-tailed deer (2008, unknown): “Although different causes of dispersal may elicit different dispersal distances, trade-offs exist between distance traveled and fitness gained, and dispersers should travel minimum distances necessary to secure highquality breeding opportunities (Baker and Rao 2004).”
• Someplace like home: Experience, habitat selection and conservation biology (2007, background): “time (or intermediate distances) before accepting a new habitat in which to live (Ward, 1987; Baker and Rao, 2004; Stamps et al., 2005).”
• Non‐optimal animal movement in human‐altered landscapes (2007, unknown): “In addition to the benefits of movement, movement entails costs in energy expenditure and increased mortality risk (Bélichon, Clobert & Massot 1996; Rothermel & Semlitsch 2002), and the cost of movement increases with the time spent moving (Baker & Rao 2004).”
• Adaptive effects of natal experience on habitat selection by dispersers (2006, background): “…outlined in this paper stem from an extensive body of theory on situations in which animals search for an item with important effects on fitness, such as a mate (e.g. Real 1990; Luttbeg 2002, 2004; Hutchinson & Halupka 2004), or a habitat (e.g. Ward 1987; Baker & Rao 2004; Stamps et al. 2005).”