Adaptation
By E. Lloyd. 2012
Introduction: Hardiness is a frequently studied psychological concept, but in the context of sports, there have been few studies, particularly on testing instruments that encapsulate this construct. Objective: To adapt the language and test the validity and reliability of the Revised Athletic Har-diness Scale (RAHS) in the context of Indonesian sports students. Methodology: A total of 189 sports students participated in this study: 135 (71.43%) were male and 54 (28.57%) were female. The sports students ranged in age from 18 to 22, with an average age of 19.48 (± 0.879). In addition to the RAHS, two other standardized instruments, MTI and SWLS, were used to test validity. Results: The CFA test results showed a good fit with the data, with a chi-square (χ2) value of 89.910 (p < 0.001), CFI = 0.936, TLI = 0.914, RMSEA = 0.080, and SRMR = 0.048. RAHSid correlated significantly with MTI (p < 0.001) and did not correlate significantly with SWLS (p > 0.05). RAHSid had high reliability, both in McDonald's omega (α) and Cronbach's alpha (α), with reliability values ranging from 0.723 to 0.840 for each dimension. Discussion: The Indonesian version of RAHSid consists of 11 items, differing from the original version, which had 12. However, psychometrically, RAHSid is a three-factor model consisting of commitment, control, and challenge, confirming the original version. Conclusions: RAHSid is a valid and reliable instrument in revealing hardiness, so that the instrument can be used to reveal hardiness in the Indonesian context, especially for sports students.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Sebastian Risi
- Andrea Soltoggio
- Kenneth O. Stanley
- Jean-Baptiste Mouret
- Paul Tonelli
- Joel Lehman
- Jeff Clune
- Justin K. Pugh
Citations in the corpus
- Born to Learn: the Inspiration, Progress, and Future of Evolved Plastic Artificial Neural Networks (2017, methodology): “Thus, the field of evolutionary computation (Holland, 1975; Eiben and Smith, 2015) includes areas such as evolutionary robotics (Harvey et al., 1997; Nolfi and Floreano, 2000) and neuroevolution (Yao, 1999) to investigate the autonomous design of complex, bio-inspired adaptive physical and neural…”
- Decentralized Consensus Algorithm with Delayed and Stochastic Gradients (2016, background): “Distributed computing on networks is an emerging technology with extensive applications in modern machine learning [10, 16, 19], sensor networks [13, 30, 49, 50], and big data analysis [4, 31].”