What should we expect from farmer field schools? A Sri Lanka case study

By R. Tripp, M. Wijeratne, V. H. Piyadasa. 2005

254 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae1204800364f1022173b05adc408f5a61ab1c44

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. E. Nkonya
2. E. Kato

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. Martina Vojtkova
2. Birte Snilstveit
3. Kentaro Toyama
4. Vanaja Ramprasad
5. H. White
6. E. Nkonya
7. Rikin Gandhi
8. Rajesh Veeraraghavan

In Soil Science

1. Martina Vojtkova
2. Birte Snilstveit
3. H. White
4. E. Nkonya
5. E. Kato

Citations in the corpus

• Farmer Field Schools for Improving Farming Practices and Farmer Outcomes: A Systematic Review (2014, background): “A small number of IPM-FFS studies also measured the burden of labour time (Birthal et al., 2000; Tripp et al. 2005; Khan et al., 2007; Mancini & Jiggins, 2008; Wu, 2010), estimating increases with adoption in India (Birthal et al.”
• Digital Green: Participatory video for agricultural extension (2007, background): “A variation of the individual-based approach in extension is the acclaimed Farmer Field Schools (FFS) model [8].”
• Impact of Farmer Field Schools on Agricultural Productivity and Poverty in East Africa (2012, background): “…Bank Asian studies (Feder, Murgai, and Quizon 2004a, 2004b; Rola, Jamias, and Quizon 2002) and additional studies in Cameroon (David 2007), Uganda (Erbaugh, Donnermeyer, and Kibwika 2001), Sri Lanka (Tripp, Wijeratne, and Piyadasa 2005), Bolivia (Bentley et al. 2007), and Peru (Ortiz et al. 2004).”