The Scherrer equation versus the 'Debye-Scherrer equation'.

By U. Holzwarth, N. Gibson. Nature Nanotechnology, 2011

3,035 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Biosynthesis of metallic nanoparticles using plant extracts and evaluation of their antibacterial properties (2018, methodology): “Scherrer equation [87] was used to determine the crystallite size from XRD diffraction pattern measured for nanoparticles:”
Synthesis, characterisation and methyl orange adsorption capacity of ferric oxide–biochar nano-composites derived from pulp and paper sludge (2017, background): “1) (Holzwarth and Gibson 2011): L ¼ Kk b cos h ð1Þ where K is a constant with the value 0.89, k is the characteristic wavelength of the X-ray source, b is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) and h is the angle diffraction.”
The Scherrer equation and the dynamical theory of X-ray diffraction. (2016, methodology): “A widely used tool to perform this operation is X-ray powder diffraction combined with the Scherrer equation (Azároff, 1968; Burton et al., 2009; Holzwarth & Gibson, 2011; Klug & Alexander, 1974; Langford & Wilson, 1978; Patterson, 1939; Vives et al., 2004): FWHM ¼ ðk Þ=ðD cos Þ; ð1Þ in which FWHM…”
Biochar applications and modern techniques for characterization (2016, background): “…designed in 1918 for determination of the mean size of singal-crystal nanoparticles or crystallite in nanocrystalline bulk materials in the form as (Holzwarth and Gibson 2011). i ¼ Kk b cos h ; ð1Þ where K is the shape factor with a value of about 0.9, k is the X-ray wavelength, b is the line…”