Men’s and Women’s Use of Intimate Partner Violence in Clinical Samples: Toward a Gender-Sensitive Analysis

By L. Hamberger. Violence and Victims, 2005

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ade481fb460c06e76ec9885370f0148118392c1a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Jennifer E. Caldwell
2. V. D. Woodbrown
3. Ko Ling Chan
4. Suzanne C. Swan

In Health

1. Jennifer E. Caldwell
2. V. D. Woodbrown
3. Ko Ling Chan
4. Suzanne C. Swan

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jennifer E. Caldwell
2. V. D. Woodbrown
3. Ko Ling Chan
4. Suzanne C. Swan

Citations in the corpus

• Gender differences in intimate partner violence outcomes. (2012, background): “…Krahé, Bieneck, & Moller, 2005; Morse, 1995; Phelan et al., 2005; Romans, Forte, Cohen, Du Mont, & Hyman, 2007; Walby & Allen, 2004; Whitaker, Haileyesus, Swahn, & Saltzman, 2007), including injuries requiring medical attention (Ehrensaft, Moffitt, & Caspi, 2004; Hamberger, 2005; Morse, 1995).”
• Gender differences in self-reports of intimate partner violence: A review (2011, methodology): “For example, Hamberger (2005) reviewed research on IPV using a model which incorporates the differences in motivations and impacts of IPV across gender.”