NEW REMAINS OF SPHAGESAURUS HUENEI (CROCODYLOMORPHA: MESOEUCROCODYLIA) FROM THE LATE CRETACEOUS OF BRAZIL

By D. Pol. 2003

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/adc283e2a23ba07a803cdf14c8379c7ff2e3ad31

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. A. Turner
2. Marco Brandalise de Andrade
3. J. Sertich
4. S. Jouve
5. S. Brusatte
6. D. Pol
7. A. Ősi
8. M. Young

In Paleontology

1. A. Turner
2. Marco Brandalise de Andrade
3. J. Sertich
4. S. Jouve
5. D. Pol
6. S. Brusatte
7. A. Ősi
8. M. Norell

Citations in the corpus

• Postcranial Anatomy of Sebecus icaeorhinus (Crocodyliformes, Sebecidae) from the Eocene of Patagonia (2012, background): “…of at least some cervical vertebra (character 90.1; modified from Clark, 1994), anteriorly projected axial prezygapophysis (character 152.1; Pol, 2003), sigmoidal anterior margin of femur (character 157.1; Buckley and Brochu, 1999), posteriorly deflected proximal region of fibula…”
• The evolution of Metriorhynchoidea (mesoeucrocodylia, thalattosuchia): an integrated approach using geometric morphometrics, analysis of disparity, and biomechanics (2010, background): “…forms (Armadilosuchus; Marinho & Carvalho, 2009), and Sphagesauridae, with their mammal-like lower jaw motion (possibly capable of lateral and propalinal movements) and tooth crown morphology (heterodonty with unilateral occlusion; Pol, 2003; Andrade & Bertini, 2008; Marinho & Carvalho, 2009).”
• Morphology of the Late Cretaceous Crocodylomorph Shamosuchus djadochtaensis and a Discussion of Neosuchian Phylogeny as Related to the Origin of Eusuchia (2009, background): “…Sues, 1996; IVPP V8274) Malawisuchus mwakayasyungutiensis (Clark et al., 1989; Gomani, 1997; MAL 45, MAL 49) Candidodon itapecurense (Carvalho, 1994) Simosuchus clarki (Buckley et al., 2000; UA 8679) Sphagesaurus huenei (Price, 1950; Pol, 2003; RCL 100) Baurusuchus pachecoi (Price, 1945; DGM 299-”
• A new Berriasian species of Goniopholis (Mesoeucrocodylia, Neosuchia) from England, and a review of the genus (2011, background): “This fossa may be erroneously identified as the antorbital fossa, as in many cases these structures occupy the same general area, anterior to the eye (e.g. Sphagesaurus, Notosuchus; see Pol, 2003; Andrade & Bertini, 2008a, b, c).”
• A new species of Baurusuchus (Crocodyliformes, Mesoeucrocodylia) from the Upper Cretaceous of Brazil, with the first complete postcranial skeleton described for the family Baurusuchidae (2010, background): “In recent phylogenies, the family Baurusuchidae has been consistently found to be nested within No‑ tosuchia (Ortega et al., 2000; Sereno et al., 2003; Pol, 2003; Pol & Norell, 2004; Pol & Apesteguia, 2005; Gasparini et al., 2005; Zaher et al., 2006; Andrade & Bertini, 2008), a clade originally…”
• Redescription of the Cranial Morphology of Mariliasuchus Amarali, and Its Phylogenetic Affinities (crocodyliformes, Notosuchia) (2006, background): “Later, several authors pointed out that Sebecosuchia (Pol, 2003; Sereno et al., 2003) was related to this group, or at least to some of its members (Buckley et al., 2000; Ortega et al., 2000).”
• The Skull of Teleosaurus cadomensis (Crocodylomorpha; Thalattosuchia), and Phylogenetic Analysis of Thalattosuchia (2009, methodology): “[Modified from Pol, 1999, 2003 (134 and 122 respectively)].”
• Skull anatomy of Dakosaurus andiniensis (Thalattosuchia: Crocodylomorpha) and the phylogenetic position of Thalattosuchia (2009, background): “considered as the sister taxon of all other thalattosuchians (Clark 1986, 1994; Buckley et al. 2000; Wu et al. 2001; Brochu et al. 2002; Pol 2003) or Metriorhynchidae (Buffetaut 1981; Vignaud 1995).”
• The evolution of jaw mechanism and dental function in heterodont crocodyliforms (2014, background): “…assemblages of highly specialised crocodyliforms (Figure 2) that possess heterodont, sometimes mammal-like dentition (Figure 3) (e.g. Clark et al. 1989; Carvalho 1994; Buckley et al. 2000; Pol 2003; Nobre and Carvalho 2006; Marinho and Carvalho 2009;O’Connor et al. 2010; Iori andCarvalho 2011).”
• A new Sphagesaurus (Mesoeucrocodylia: Notosuchia) from the Upper Cretaceous of Monte Alto City (Bauru Group, Brazil), and a revision of the Sphagesauridae (2008, methodology): “Nonetheless, RCL-100 was reported originally as from Buenópolis City, São Paulo State (Pol 2003), but was in fact collected in the Fazenda Buenópolis Rail Station, located in the vicinities of Cravinhos City, Northern São Paulo State, Southeastern Brazil (C. G. Cartelle, personal communication).”
• A new species of Dyrosaurus (Crocodylomorpha, Dyrosauridae) from the early Eocene of Morocco: phylogenetic implications (2006, background): “Thalattosuchia is also closely related to Dyrosauridae in these studies (Clark, 1994; Wu et al., 1997, 2001a; Larsson & Gado, 2000; Brochu et al., 2002; Pol, 2003; Jouve, 2004; Pol & Norell, 2004a, b; Pol et al., 2004), although Sereno et al.”
• An armadillo-like sphagesaurid crocodyliform from the Late Cretaceous of Brazil (2009, background): “More recently, a partial snout regarded as S. huenei was reported by Kellner et al. (1995), a nearly complete skull of S. huenei described by Pol (2003) and a new sphagesaurid, Adamantinasuchus navae Nobre and Carvalho, 2006 was described, shedding new light on the anatomy and systematics of the…”
• LATE CRETACEOUS TERRESTRIAL VERTEBRATES FROM MADAGASCAR: IMPLICATIONS FOR LATIN AMERICAN BIOGEOGRAPHY1 (2006, unknown): “It is worth noting that Ortega et al. (2000) and Pol (2003) include several taxa not included in the other two analyses, resulting in a more geographically widespread notosuchian (or ziphosuchian) clade.”
• New Araripesuchus Remains from the Early Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian–Turonian) of Patagonia (2005, background): “Mesoeucrocodylian crocodyliforms were remarkably diverse in the Cretaceous of Gondwana, showing a wide morphological diversity that contrasts with the characteristic anatomy of extant crocodylians.”
• Osteology and phylogeny of a new species of Araripesuchus (Crocodyliformes: Mesoeucrocodylia) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar (2006, background): “There has been no doubt about the sister relationship between A. gomesii and A. patagonicus (Ortega et al. 2000, Pol 2003, Pol and Norell 2003, Turner 2004).”
• What is Geosaurus? Redescription of Geosaurus giganteus (Thalattosuchia: Metriorhynchidae) from the Upper Jurassic of Bayern, Germany (2009, background): “However, the crowns have extensive wear surfaces (Price, 1950; Pol, 2003).”
• Cranial osteology and phylogenetic relationships of Hamadasuchus rebouli (Crocodyliformes: Mesoeucrocodylia) from the Cretaceous of Morocco (2007, background): “…antorbital fenestra, a deeper than wide snout, and posteriorly orientated retroarticular process (Gasparini et al., 1991; Ortega et al., 1996, 2000; Buckley & Brochu, 1999; Buckley et al., 2000; Brochu et al., 2002; Pol, 2003; Sereno et al., 2003; Carvalho et al., 2004; Turner & Calvo, 2005).”
• The Evolution of Extreme Hypercarnivory in Metriorhynchidae (Mesoeucrocodylia: Thalattosuchia) Based on Evidence from Microscopic Denticle Morphology (2010, background): “…related characters such as type of carina, denticle morphology and density, tooth crown shape, proportional mandible depth, and presence or absence of grinding areas and worn teeth (e.g., Van Valkenburgh and Molnar, 2002; Pol, 2003; Van Valkenburgh et al., 2004; Andrade and Bertini, 2008a).”