Using PPI network autocorrelation in hierarchical multi-label classification trees for gene function prediction

By Daniela Stojanova, Michelangelo Ceci, D. Malerba, Saso Dzeroski. 2013

51 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Ontologies and catalogs of gene functions, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) and MIPS-FUN, assume that functional classes are organized hierarchically, that is, general functions include more specific ones. This has recently motivated the development of several machine learning algorithms for gene function prediction that leverages on this hierarchical organization where instances may belong to multiple classes. In addition, it is possible to exploit relationships among examples, since it is plausible that related genes tend to share functional annotations. Although these relationships have been identified and extensively studied in the area of protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, they have not received much attention in hierarchical and multi-class gene function prediction. Relations between genes introduce autocorrelation in functional annotations and violate the assumption that instances are independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.), which underlines most machine learning algorithms. Although the explicit consideration of these relations brings additional complexity to the learning process, we expect substantial benefits in predictive accuracy of learned classifiers. This article demonstrates the benefits (in terms of predictive accuracy) of considering autocorrelation in multi-class gene function prediction. We develop a tree-based algorithm for considering network autocorrelation in the setting of Hierarchical Multi-label Classification (HMC). We empirically evaluate the proposed algorithm, called NHMC (Network Hierarchical Multi-label Classification), on 12 yeast datasets using each of the MIPS-FUN and GO annotation schemes and exploiting 2 different PPI networks. The results clearly show that taking autocorrelation into account improves the predictive performance of the learned models for predicting gene function. Our newly developed method for HMC takes into account network information in the learning phase: When used for gene function prediction in the context of PPI networks, the explicit consideration of network autocorrelation increases the predictive performance of the learned models. Overall, we found that this holds for different gene features/ descriptions, functional annotation schemes, and PPI networks: Best results are achieved when the PPI network is dense and contains a large proportion of function-relevant interactions.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Computational Biology & Bioinformatics

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Marinka Zitnik
  2. Jure Leskovec
  3. William L. Hamilton
  4. Rex Ying
  5. Petar Velickovic
  6. Philip S. Yu
  7. Percy Liang
  8. Pan Li

In Molecular Biology

  1. Marinka Zitnik
  2. Jure Leskovec
  3. Mathias Lietaert
  4. Celine Vens
  5. Felipe Kenji Nakano
  6. Petar Velickovic
  7. William L. Hamilton
  8. Rex Ying

In Computational Biology & Bioinformatics

  1. Jure Leskovec
  2. Marinka Zitnik
  3. Petar Velickovic
  4. Yiding Yang
  5. Xinchao Wang
  6. Bernard Ghanem
  7. Guohao Li
  8. Pietro Lio'

Citations in the corpus