Sampling method influences the structure of plant–pollinator networks

By R. Gibson, B. Knott, Tim Eberlein, J. Memmott. 2011

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/adaf7c5b90a35ebe7ffb2e84b9a2a61ea60e5ef8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Carsten F. Dormann
2. J. Olesen
3. A. Traveset
4. B. Dalsgaard
5. Jochen Fründ
6. Kristian Trøjelsgaard
7. Pedro Jordano
8. P. Maruyama

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Carsten F. Dormann
2. A. Traveset
3. Pedro Jordano
4. Jochen Fründ
5. B. Dalsgaard
6. J. Olesen
7. Kristian Trøjelsgaard
8. Martin Schaefer

In Plant Science

1. Carsten F. Dormann
2. A. Traveset
3. J. Olesen
4. Kristian Trøjelsgaard
5. Pedro Jordano
6. Jochen Fründ
7. B. Dalsgaard
8. Martin Schaefer

Citations in the corpus

• Identifying Causes of Patterns in Ecological Networks: Opportunities and Limitations (2017, background): “Both incomplete sampling and focal group bias have emerged as methodological concerns in recent studies (e.g., Nielsen & Bascompte 2007, Gibson et al. 2011, Sørensen et al. 2011, RiveraHutinel et al. 2012, Fründ et al. 2016, Vizentin-Bugoni et al. 2016).”
• Morphological and Spatio‐Temporal Mismatches Shape a Neotropical Savanna Plant‐Hummingbird Network (2014, methodology): “…method we used should increase the influence of abundance on the interaction records compared to the timed observations carried out by Vizentin-Bugoni et al. (2014) in the Atlantic Forest, since it samples the interactions per plant species relative to their abundances (see Gibson et al. 2011).”
• Sampling networks of ecological interactions (2015, background): “…acknowledged it and attempted to determine its influence (Ollerton & Cranmer, 2002; Nielsen & Bascompte, 2007; Vázquez, Chacoff & Cagnolo, 2009; Gibson et al., 2011; Olesen et al., 2011; Chacoff et al., 2012; Rivera-Hutinel et al., 2012; Olito & Fox, 2014; Bascompte & Jordano, 2014;…”
• Global patterns of mainland and insular pollination networks (2016, background): “…& Sons Ltd4 Mainland vs. insular pollination network structure Global Ecology and Biogeography, 25, 880–890, VC 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 883 descriptors such as the proportion of singletons, although they do not seem to affect properties such as connectance or nestedness (Gibson et al., 2011).”
• Why flower visitation is a poor proxy for pollination: measuring single‐visit pollen deposition, with implications for pollination networks and conservation (2013, background): “This modelling activity has become linked with issues of specialization and generalization in plants, pollinating animals and their interactions (Waser et al. 1996; Johnson & Steiner 2000; Gibson et al. 2011).”
• Merging DNA metabarcoding and ecological network analysis to understand and build resilient terrestrial ecosystems (2016, background): “To date, however, it has been difficult to characterize the 59 structure of most species-rich ecosystems due to sampling, technical and/or logistical 60 constraints (e.g. Gibson et al. 2011).”