The Spectra of Random Graphs with Given Expected Degrees
By Fan Chung Graham, Linyuan Lu, Van H. Vu. Internet Mathematics, 2004
428 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ada18a5cc9a1ce3f3942fddeb95edeb1c7a908ef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Mathematical Physics
- Roberto Imbuzeiro Oliveira
- Tobias Johnson
- Christopher E. Hoffman
- Matthew Kahle
- Elliot Paquette
- Larry Goldstein
- Alexander V. Goltsev
- Nicholas A. Cook
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Jure Leskovec
- Mark Newman
- Alex Arenas
- Michael W. Mahoney
- Santo Fortunato
- Jürgen Kurths
- Alexander V. Goltsev
- Yamir Moreno
In Statistics and Probability
- T. Von
- Tobias Johnson
- Larry Goldstein
- Nicholas A. Cook
- Michael W. Mahoney
- Christopher E. Hoffman
- Alex Arenas
- Anirban Dasgupta
Citations in the corpus
- Critical phenomena in complex networks (2007, background): “However, in an uncorrelated random complex network, the maximum eigenvalue λmax is determined by the cutoff qcut(N) of the degree distribution, λmax ≈ q cut (N) (Chung et al., 2003; Dorogovtsev et al., 2003; Krivelevich and Sudakov, 2003). In scale-free networks ( γ <∞), the cutoff diverges in the l”
- Anomaly detection in dynamic networks: a survey (2015, methodology): “Vertex detection [55, 56, 67, 106] Subgraph detection [3, 13, 30, 31] Change detection [38] Edge detection [22] Change detection [112] Vertex detection [129] Event detection [68, 72, 75, 77, 83, 84, 93, 113, 114, 115, 122] Change detection [7, 65, 66] Edge detection [1, 80] Subgraph detection [60, 8”
- AWB-GCN: A Graph Convolutional Network Accelerator with Runtime Workload Rebalancing (2019, background): “rs, the GCN is able to extract very high-level abstracted features for various learning purposes. 2.2 Characteristics of Power-Law Graphs Real-world graphs typically follow the power-law distribution [3,4,12,40], which states that the number of nodes y of a given degree x is proportional to x b for ”
- Spectral Gaps of Random Graphs and Applications (2012, background): “Improvements and corrections to this argument brought the bound to p = ω(log4 n/n), [43] and later to as low as p log2 n/n [8].”
- Statistical properties of community structure in large social and information networks (2008, methodology): “Eigenvalues of power law graphs have also been studied by Mihail and Papadimitriou [117], Chung, Lu, Vu [43, 44, 45], and Flaxman, Frieze, and Fenner [69].”
- ALGEBRAIC CONNECTIVITY OF ERDÖS-RÉNYI GRAPHS NEAR THE CONNECTIVITY THRESHOLD (2014, methodology): “Chung, Lu and Vu [11] later improved this estimate in the case of the normalized Laplacian L = D− 12LD− 12 by using the trace method.”
- The Kuramoto model in complex networks (2015, background): “In particular, for uncorrelated networks with a given degree distribution we have that [59]”
- A Survey of Statistical Network Models (2009, methodology): “.g.,239], and they either x the degree-distribution parameters or compute distributions that are conditional on some function of the degree distributions or sequences, such as their expectations (cf. [235;70]). Software is available to sample from the space of random graphs with a given degree distr”
- Toward link predictability of complex networks (2015, neutral): “If p is finite and the network size N goes to infinity, the spectral density adjacency matrices in ER networks obey the Wigner semicircle law and the eigenvectors are distributed isotropically at random (29, 30).”
- Community Structure in Large Networks: Natural Cluster Sizes and the Absence of Large Well-Defined Clusters (2008, methodology): “Here we work with the random graph model with given expected degrees, as described by Chung and Lu [42, 40, 44, 39, 41, 45, 46, 43].”
- Random walks in peer-to-peer networks (2004, methodology): “We use expanders since expansion is desired and believed to hold in every reasonable network and network model [2], [18], [19].”
- Distribution of subgraphs of random regular graphs (2008, background): “It was shown in [23] that the eigenvalue distribution of M(G) for a random graph G with a given expected degree distribution satisfies the semi-circle law if the minimum degree is greater than a power of log n.”
- Discrete-time Markov chain approach to contact-based disease spreading in complex networks (2009, methodology): “For the RP corresponding to the SIS spreading process usually adopted [8], the classical result for uncorrelated SF networks is recovered because, in this case, the largest eigenvalue [35,36] is Λmax = 〈k (2)〉/〈k〉.”
- Concentration of the adjacency matrix and of the Laplacian in random graphs with independent edges (2009, methodology): “One of them is the “trace method” [26, 28, 38, 35, 36] which consists of analyzing traces of high powers of the matrices under consideration.”
- Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node Classification (2019, methodology): “We choose the eigenvector e ∈ R Chung et al. (2004) and Coja-Oghlan (2007) proved similar theorems.”
- The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks (2014, methodology): “For the RP corresponding to the SIS spreading process, instead, the largest eigenvalue must be calculated [236].”
- Size biased couplings and the spectral gap for random regular graphs (2015, methodology): “However, it is more flexible in some ways than the trace method: it has been adapted to establish bounds on the spectral gap for several other random graph models (see, for instance, [15, 19, 20, 25, 29, 40, 42]), and it can be applied when d grows with n, as observed in [15].”