Size- and density-dependent habitat use in predators: consequences for habitat shifts in young fish

By P. Byström, L. Persson, E. Wahlström, E. Westman. 2003

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effect of a change in physical structure and cover on fish and fish habitat in freshwater ecosystems – a review and meta-analysis (2007, background): “Observational evidence to support the effects of predators on fish habitat selection in north temperate (Eklöv 1997; Hall and Rudstam 1999; MacRae and Jackson 2001; Pratt and Fox 2001; Byström et al. 2003), west coast (Rodewald and Foster 1998; Scheuerell and Schindler 2003; Cooperman and Markle 200”
Effects of early experience on group behaviour in fish (2007, background): “Habitat transition phases are thus typically associated with high levels of mortality as predators readily feed on prey that have not yet adapted to the new environment (Biro et al. 2003; Bystrom et al. 2003).”
Exploring Ultimate Hypotheses to Predict Diel Vertical Migrations in Coregonid Fish (2007, background): “Similarly, horizontal migrations of fish between littoral and pelagic sites in lakes, or timing of ontogenetic habitat shifts, can be highly flexible and inducible by varying diet profitabilities and predator densities (Werner et al. 1983; Byström et al. 2003; Hölker and Mehner 2005).”
Ontogenetic and spatial variations in brown trout habitat selection (2010, background): “On one hand, the type, number and size of predators affect prey size distribution (Byström et al. 2003), promoting differential behavioural responses of life stages concerning habitat selection.”