Reciprocal Effects of Victimization and Routine Activities
By Margit Averdijk. 2011
90 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Health, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad94683c819eba2155657f4a274ffcfe18b797bf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health
In Sociology and Political Science
- J. Turanovic
- Travis C. Pratt
- M. Madan
- Mahesh K. Nalla
- Kristy Holtfreter
- Alex R. Piquero
- Michael D. Reisig
- Kevin M. Beaver
Citations in the corpus
- Sexual Harassment in Public Spaces (2016, background): “…linked to personal and lifestyle characteristics (Tseloni & Pease, 2004) which include going out to do required shopping, workplace, school, among others are unavoidable for many (Averdijk, 2010), making fear of crime an unavoidable consequence with limited opportunity for altering situations.”
- Lifestyle and Routine Activity Theories Revisited: The Importance of “Risk” to the Study of Victimization (2016, background): “…easily discerned as relatively low-risk behaviors, an item that more frequently passes muster as a risky lifestyle indicator is the frequency with which people “spend the evening out or away from home” (see, e.g., Averdijk, 2011; Bunch et al., 2014; Giblin, 2008; Klevens, Duque, & Ramirez, 2002).”
- “Can’t Stop, Won’t Stop”: Self-Control, Risky Lifestyles, and Repeat Victimization (2012, background): “More recently, Averdijk (2011) examined the impact of victimization on individual changes to routine activities such as shopping and evenings away from home.”