Relative clustering validity criteria: A comparative overview
By Lucas Vendramin, Ricardo José Gabrielli Barreto Campello, Eduardo R. Hruschka. Statistical analysis and data mining, 2010
365 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad93d3b55fb94827c4df45e9fc67c55a7d90d00b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Arthur Zimek
- Jörg Sander
- Ricardo José Gabrielli Barreto Campello
- Davoud Moulavi
- Peer Kröger
- M. Emre Celebi
- Hassan A. Kingravi
- Patricio A. Vela
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Jörg Sander
- Arthur Zimek
- M. Emre Celebi
- Hassan A. Kingravi
- Patricio A. Vela
- Ricardo José Gabrielli Barreto Campello
- Peer Kröger
- Sami Sieranoja
Citations in the corpus
- A Comparative Study of Efficient Initialization Methods for the K-Means Clustering Algorithm (2012, methodology): “The value of this parameter can be determined automatically by means of various cluster validity measures [17].”
- Density‐based clustering (2019, background): “While there are many indexes or quality measures for the internal evaluation of clustering results (see, e.g., the work of Vendramin, Campello, and Hruschka (2010) for an overview and comparison), most of them are in general not suitable for the evaluation of density-based clustering, as they…”
- Density-Based Clustering Validation (2014, methodology): “The evaluation of a relative validity index is usually performed as follows [30, 3]: (i) several partitions are generated with different clustering algorithms; (ii) for each clustering algorithm the ability of the new measure to identify the correct number of clusters, as defined by the ground…”