Automated discovery, interaction and composition of Semantic Web services
By Katia P. Sycara, Massimo Paolucci, Anupriya Ankolekar, Naveen Kumar Srinivasan. Journal of Web Semantics, 2003
701 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad938edde98d8e7cf4108fc382d481f68825b024
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Information Systems
Citations in the corpus
- Web Service Semantics - WSDL-S (2005, neutral): “Semantic matching and reasoning techniques can be used to find the semantic similarity between the service description and the request [ SPAS03 , SMSV05].”
- Toward autonomic web services trust and selection (2004, methodology): “Service matchmaking techniques, supported by the OWL-S service ontology, attempt to achieve such service discovery, selection, and binding, albeit at design-time [Sycara et al., 2003].”
- Automated semantic web service discovery with OWLS-MX (2006, methodology): “Prominent examples of such logic-based only approaches to semantic service discovery are provided by the OWLS-UDDI matchmaker [16], RACER [11], MAMA [5], and the WSMO service discovery approach [20].”
- OWLS-MX: A hybrid Semantic Web service matchmaker for OWL-S services (2009, neutral): “The logic-based variant OWLS-M0 of OWLS-MX is similar to the prominent OWLS-UDDI matchmaker [ 18 ] but is different with respect to the following issues: OWLS-UDDI makes use of a different notion of plug-in matching and does not perform additional subsumed-by matching.”