Atomic Force Microscope Images of Nanobubbles on a Hydrophobic Surface and Corresponding Force-Separation Data

By James W. G. Tyrrell, P. Attard. 2002

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale (2005, methodology): “This hypothesis is bolstered by the observation of nanobubbles using tapping-mode atomic force microscopy Ishida et al., 2000; Tyrrell and Attard, 2001, 2002 , and further supported by the observation that apparent slip decreases when the fluid is degassed Boehnke et al., 1999; Granick et al., 2003…”
Effective slip in pressure-driven Stokes flow (2003, methodology): “Note, however, that the distribution of the nano-bubbles in Tyrrell & Attard (2001, 2002) is qualitatively different (larger surface coverage) from those found by Ishida et al. (2000) on silicon wafer surfaces hydrophobized by OTS.”
Surface nanobubbles and nanodroplets (2015, methodology): “In any case, several pioneering concepts conceived in the early work by Tyrrell and Attard (2001, 2002) turned out to be highly relevant for the later understanding of the nanobubble properties, namely, the ideas that nanoubbles may not be hemispherical but irregularly shaped due to the strong…”
Microfluidics: The no-slip boundary condition (2005, background): “Nanobubbles in polar liquids? Over the last four years, many groups have reported experimental observation of nanobubbles against hydrophobic surfaces in water [5, 71, 76, 106, 144, 148, 152, 165, 166, 191, 190], with typical sizes ∼ 10−100 nm and large surface coverage (see also the reflectivity me”