A Scalable Laplace Approximation for Neural Networks
By Hippolyt Ritter, Aleksandar Botev, David Barber. 2018
513 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Optimization & Training, Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Optimization & Training
- Andrew Gordon Wilson
- Pavel Izmailov
- Dmitry P. Vetrov
- Philipp Hennig
- Laurence Aitchison
- Timur Garipov
- Wesley J. Maddox
- Guodong Zhang
In Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods
- Andrew Gordon Wilson
- Yarin Gal
- Dmitry P. Vetrov
- Pavel Izmailov
- Richard E. Turner
- Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan
- Zoubin Ghahramani
- Dustin Tran
Citations in the corpus
- Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance Awareness (2020, methodology): “…Laplace approximation has a long history in GP and NN literature (Tierney et al., 1989; Denker and LeCun, 1991; Rasmussen and Williams, 2006; MacKay, 1992; Ritter et al., 2018), and the theoretical connection between a Laplace-approximated DNN and GP has being explored recently (Khan et al., 2019).”
- A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learning (2019, methodology): “In particular SWAG achieves higher test likelihood compared to many state-of-the-art approaches, including MC-Dropout [14], temperature scaling [19], SGLD [59], KFAC-Laplace [54] and SWA [27] on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet, on a range of architectures.”
- Posterior Meta-Replay for Continual Learning (2021, background): “We investigate how this problem can be tackled by selecting the task-embedding that yields the lowest predictive uncertainty, effectively resorting to out-of-distribution (OOD) detection (Louizos & Welling, 2017; Ritter et al., 2018).”
- Online Structured Laplace Approximations For Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting (2018, methodology): “Our work links the Kronecker factored Laplace approximation [34] to Bayesian online learning [31] similar to how Variational Continual Learning [30] connects Online Variational Learning [7, 13] to Bayes-by-Backprop [1].”
- Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networks (2020, methodology): “LLLA with a matrix normal distribution as described in the previous section is a special case of KFLA (Ritter et al., 2018).”
- Practical Deep Learning with Bayesian Principles (2019, background): “Many other approaches have recently been proposed to compute posterior approximations by training deterministic networks [46, 37, 38].”
- Fast and Scalable Bayesian Deep Learning by Weight-Perturbation in Adam (2018, methodology): “The goal of this approach is similar to other approaches that employ structured approximations (Ritter et al., 2018; Louizos & Welling, 2016; Sun et al., 2017).”
- Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalization (2020, background): “Recent work has largely focused on scalable inference (e.g., Blundell et al., 2015; Gal & Ghahramani, 2016; Kendall & Gal, 2017; Ritter et al., 2018; Khan et al., 2018; Maddox et al., 2019), function-space inspired priors (e.”
- SLANG: Fast Structured Covariance Approximations for Bayesian Deep Learning with Natural Gradient (2018, methodology): “Another recent work has applied K-FAC to find a Laplace approximation [29].”
- Laplace Redux - Effortless Bayesian Deep Learning (2021, methodology): “LAs are widely used to approximate the posterior distribution in logistic regression [31], Gaussian process classification [32, 33], and also for Bayesian neural networks (BNNs), both shallow [34] and deep [23].”
- Pitfalls of In-Domain Uncertainty Estimation and Ensembling in Deep Learning (2020, methodology): “al inference (Blundell et al., 2015; Kingma et al., 2015; Louizos & Welling, 2017), batch normalization (Ioffe & Szegedy, 2015; Teye et al., 2018; Atanov et al., 2019), Laplace approximation (Ritter et al., 2018) and many more. Snapshot-based methods aim to obtain sets of weights for deep le”
- Subspace Inference for Bayesian Deep Learning (2019, methodology): “Subspace inference is competitive with SWAG and consistently outperforms most of the other baselines, including MC-dropout (Gal and Ghahramani, 2016), temperature scaling (Guo et al., 2017) and KFAC-Laplace Ritter et al. (2018).”
- A Review and Comparative Study on Probabilistic Object Detection in Autonomous Driving (2020, methodology): “Multiple techniques for generating approximate solutions of the posterior distribution have been proposed [25]–[34].”
- Uncertainty Estimation with Infinitesimal Jackknife, Its Distribution and Mean-Field Approximation (2020, methodology): “For BNN ( KFAC ) and RUE , we use mini-batch approximations on subsets of the training set to scale up on ImageNet, as suggested in [41, 42].”
- Fast Uncertainty Estimates and Bayesian Model Averaging of DNNs (2018, methodology): “Next, we compare the SWAG methods with diagonal Laplace approximations on a toy regression problem: modelling y ∼ x(3) + N(0, 3(2)) with a simple two-layer MLP as in [16].”
- A survey of uncertainty in deep neural networks (2021, methodology): “1[20] 3[30] 4[149] 5[75] 6[213] 7[129] 8[63] 9[80] 10[150] 11[143] 12[84] 13[235] 14[145] 15[135] 16[146] 17[272]”
- Model Selection in Bayesian Neural Networks via Horseshoe Priors (2017, background): “, 2014), probabilistic backpropagation (HernándezLobato and Adams, 2015) as well as scalable Laplace approximations (Ritter et al., 2018) have reinvigorated interest in BNNs by allowing efficient scalable inference.”
- Sketching Curvature for Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection for Deep Neural Networks (2021, methodology): “First, we compare with the two closely-related approaches, namely, Local Ensembles [Madras et al., 2020] and KFAC Laplace approximation [Ritter et al., 2018], which use curvature estimation to augment a trained model with uncertainty estimates.”
- Radial Bayesian Neural Networks: Beyond Discrete Support In Large-Scale Bayesian Deep Learning (2019, background): “…prior-focused Bayesian approaches to continual learning in which the posterior at the end of learning a task becomes a prior when learning the next task [Kirk-patrick et al., 2017, Zenke et al., 2017, Chaudhry et al., 2018, Nguyen et al., 2018, Farquhar and Gal, 2018b, Ritter et al., 2018].”