How Robust is the Kearney/Foreign Policy Globalisation Index?
By Ben Lockwood. 2004
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad5b081cd0aa17ac2ff2d1a413c606375f74fd7f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Niklas Potrafke
- Savina Gygli
- Florian Haelg
- Jan-Egbert Sturm
- P. Brewer
- Ugur Korkut Pata
- Axel Dreher
- P. Ellis
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Operationalizing Psychic Distance: A Revised Approach (2007, background): “27 38 4 P sy ch ic d is ta n ce r an k 10 3 8 14 6 11 24 16 20 23 21 1 2 56 Paul A. Brewer for trade and single units for trade agreements), there needs to be a standardization process to ensure that each variable is expressed in a form that is homogeneous with the other variables (Lockwood 2004).”
- Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization (2006, unknown): “7A similar methodology has been suggested by Lockwood (2004), testing for the robustness of the Kearny/ Foreign Policy index of globalization.”
- The KOF Globalisation Index – revisited (2019, background): “Lockwood (2004) proposes a more rigorous way of controlling for geographical characteristics of a country: he regresses each variable on exogenous factors such as population, land area and whether a country is landlocked.”