Automated data reduction workflows for astronomy

By W. Freudling, M. Romaniello, D. Bramich, P. Ballester, V. Forchì, C. E. Garcia-Dablo, S. Moehler, M. Neeser. 2013

454 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Data from complex modern astronomical instruments often consist of a large number of different science and calibration files, and their reduction requires a variety of software tools. The execution chain of the tools represents a complex workflow that needs to be tuned and supervised, often by individual researchers that are not necessarily experts for any specific instrument. The efficiency of data reduction can be improved by using automatic workflows to organise data and execute the sequence of data reduction steps. To realize such efficiency gains, we designed a system that allows intuitive representation, execution and modification of the data reduction workflow, and has facilities for inspection and interaction with the data. The European Southern Observatory (ESO) has developed Reflex, an environment to automate data reduction workflows. Reflex is implemented as a package of customized components for the Kepler workflow engine. Kepler provides the graphical user interface to create an executable flowchart-like representation of the data reduction process. Key features of Reflex are a rule-based data organiser, infrastructure to re-use results, thorough book-keeping, data progeny tracking, interactive user interfaces, and a novel concept to exploit information created during data organisation for the workflow execution. Reflex includes novel concepts to increase the efficiency of astronomical data processing. While Reflex is a specific implementation of astronomical scientific workflows within the Kepler workflow engine, the overall design choices and methods can also be applied to other environments for running automated science workflows.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Information Systems and Management, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad4f067304551c20b50a3c0f7e02e3e9d6946003

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

  1. R. Gratton
  2. R. Maiolino
  3. H. Baumgardt

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. R. Maiolino
  3. D. M. Alexander
  4. Mara Salvato
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. M. Brusa
  7. D. Lutz
  8. A. Merloni

Citations in the corpus