EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF HOST-PLANT SPECIALIZATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE TRIBE NYMPHALINI

By N. Janz, K. Nyblom, S. Nylin. 2001

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad4b64b92afa02c8c19289a4f99657d592146974

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. N. Wahlberg
2. S. Nylin
3. N. Janz
4. David J. Harris
5. C. Mitter
6. J. Regier
7. Andrew Sih
8. J. Scriber

In Genetics

1. N. Wahlberg
2. S. Nylin
3. N. Janz
4. C. Mitter
5. J. Regier
6. Jeannine Cavender-Bares
7. M. Matthews
8. R. Karban

In Plant Science

1. N. Janz
2. N. Wahlberg
3. S. Nylin
4. Jeannine Cavender-Bares
5. R. Karban
6. A. Wilczek
7. V. Tepedino
8. S. Sipes

Citations in the corpus

• Morphology versus molecules: resolution of the positions of Nymphalis, Polygonia, and related genera (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) (2003, methodology): “To investigate the implications of the new phylogenetic data for reconstructions of host plant utilization in Nymphalis, Polygonia, and related genera (Janz et al., 2001), we used the program MacClade (Maddison and Maddison, 1992).”
• Butterfly host plant range: an example of plasticity as a promoter of speciation? (2007, background): “There is some evidence that machinery associated with feeding on ancestral hosts can persist over long time spans, permitting re-colonization (Janz et al. 2001; Nylin and Wahlberg in press), but is this machinery a preserved dedicated module or is the ability to feed on the ancestral plant just a…”
• Host selection patterns in insects breeding in bracket fungi (2004, background): “In this they are supposed to differ from insects that feed on vascular plants, which generally have a higher degree of specialisation in host use (Janz et al., 2001).”
• Pollen‐host specificity and evolutionary patterns of host switching in a clade of specialist bees (Apoidea: Diadasia) (2005, background): “a residual adaptation to an ancestral host (e.g. Keese, 1998; Berenbaum & Passoa, 1999; Janz et al., 2001).”
• Molecular phylogenetics of heliothine moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Heliothinae), with comments on the evolution of host range and pest status (2008, background): “…typical of Schinia, low fecundity, low vagility and host-specific crypsis and oviposition behaviour should lower the frequency of the oviposition mistakes that probably underlie expansions of host range (Janz et al., 2001), and lower the chance that a mistakenly placed individual will survive.”
• Evolutionary Ecology of Oviposition Strategies (2008, background): “Although present across most insect taxa, the pattern is not universally true; a few groups contain mostly generalists, such as Orthoptera (Bernays and Minkenberg, 1997), and the groups that are dominated by specialists typically include polyphagous exceptions (Janz and Nylin, 1998; Janz et al., 200”
• Integrating micro- and macroevolutionary processes in community ecology (2003, background): “…perspective on the current ecological dynamics and microevolutionary processes occurring within them. positively linked to speciation and diversity of lineages (West-Eberhard 1989, Janz et al. 2001, Schlichting, in press), although the underlying mechanisms for this are unclear (see Agrawal 2001).”
• Predicting novel herbivore–plant interactions (2013, background): “As a broad pattern, herbivore host breadth is evolutionarily labile, where even closely related herbivores may consume vastly diff erent numbers of plant host species (Janz et al. 2001).”
• Evolution of insect‐plant relationships: chemical constraints, coadaptation, and concordance of insect/plant traits (2002, background): “mechanisms such as the cytochrome P450 monooxygenases used in detoxifying furanocoumarins of the Apiaceae and Rutaceae may play central roles in determining: (1) the strong preponderance of specialists, (2) strong taxonomic conservatism in host affiliations, and (3) why specialization is not a dead ”