METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS IN CHANGING LANDSCAPES: A NEW SPATIALLY REALISTIC MODEL FOR FOREST PLANTS

By K. Verheyen, M. Vellend, H. V. Calster, G. Peterken, Martin Hermy. 2004

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad45b6bfef37ee8f7597c63c9c3cc671eed46a26

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Martin Hermy
2. K. Verheyen
3. K. Wilson
4. Olivier Honnay
5. M. Vellend
6. R. Pressey
7. Bruno Hérault
8. Gil Bohrer

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Olivier Honnay
2. Martin Hermy
3. A. Helm
4. Z. Münzbergová
5. K. Verheyen
6. M. Pärtel
7. Bruno Hérault
8. A. Kolb

In Plant Science

1. Z. Münzbergová
2. Olivier Honnay
3. Martin Hermy
4. A. Helm
5. K. Verheyen
6. A. Kolb
7. M. Pärtel
8. M. Diekmann

Citations in the corpus

• In search of forage: predicting dynamic habitats of Mongolian gazelles using satellite-based estimates of vegetation productivity (2008, background): “Journal compilation © 2007 British Ecological Society Blackwell Publishing Ltd In search of forage: predicting dynamic habitats of Mongolian gazelles using satellite-based estimates of vegetation productivity”
• Long‐term assessment of seed limitation in plants: results from an 11‐year experiment (2006, background): “The empirical evidence of seed-limited distribution in plants comes primarily from analyses of species distribution in relation to the occurrence of suitable habitats (Quintana-Ascencio & Menges 1996; Bastin & Thomas 1999; Dupré & Ehrlén 2002; Verheyen et al. 2003, 2004).”
• Metapopulations and metacommunities: combining spatial and temporal perspectives in plant ecology (2012, background): “alternative approach to direct observation of dynamics (Verheyen et al. 2004).”
• Forest fragmentation drives Atlantic forest of northeastern Brazil to biotic homogenization (2011, methodology): “Taxonomic similarity across sub-regions was examined via three widely adopted indexes – Jaccard, Raup and Cick (RC) and Bray–Curtis distance (see Verheyen et al., 2004; Vellend et al., 2007), plus randomization techniques to control for potential influences from unbalanced numbers of species.”
• Species in a dynamic world: Consequences of habitat network dynamics on conservation planning (2012, background): “For example, the potential rate of a population’s growth, which is characterised by species’ fecundity and longevity, is a key factor in coping with temporal variability (Altermatt et al., 2011; Bossuyt and Honnay, 2006; Verheyen et al., 2004).”
• The relative importance of local, regional and historical factors determining the distribution of plants in fragmented riverine forests: an emergent group approach (2005, methodology): “This enabled us to define several ecological profiles (or emergent groups) among the forest flora and thus may offer an opportunity to predict and model their distinctive responses to spatial and temporal discontinuities (Matlack & Monde, 2004; Verheyen et al., 2004).”
• Conservation planning in a changing world. (2007, background): “A remaining challenge for conservation planning now being addressed [76, 77 ] is to evaluate the different disturbance regimes arising from alternative policies and management prescriptions by linking models for landscape simulation and species persistence.”
• A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning : Comparison with existing indices and application to a case study (2007, methodology): “• Flux (F) and area-weighted flux (AWF) by Bunn et al. (2000) and Urban and Keitt (2001), which are as well equivalent to a landscape-level version of the incidence function model (IFM) measures (Hanski, 1994; Moilanen and Hanski, 2001; Verheyen et al., 2004 ) obtained by summing the IFM values for”
• Homogenization of forest plant communities and weakening of species–environment relationships via agricultural land use (2007, background): “…and temporal considerations somewhat more explicitly, demonstrating important consequences for community dynamics of both spatial isolation of individual habitat patches (e.g. Jacquemyn et al. 2001), and of continuous destruction and creation of forest patches over time (Verheyen et al. 2004).”
• Effects of long‐distance dispersal for metapopulation survival and genetic structure at ecological time and spatial scales (2005, methodology): “1997; Neubert & Caswell 2000; Austerlitz & Garnier-Géré 2003) and multispecies community context (Higgins & Cain 2002; Verheyen et al. 2004).”
• Legacies of the past in the present-day forest biodiversity: a review of past land-use effects on forest plant species composition and diversity (2007, background): “mutualism, predation) in determining the establishment of forest plant species, (6) modeling the impact of land-use changes on forest plant species distribution and diversity (cf. Matlack and Monde 2004; Verheyen et al. 2004), (7) quantifying possible extinction debts for ancient forests as a conseq”
• Dispersal traits determine plant response to habitat connectivity in an urban landscape (2011, background): “Seed number was also relevant in empirical studies, in which distances between habitat patches by far exceeded regular dispersal ranges (e.g. Dupré and Ehrlén 2002; Verheyen et al. 2004; Kolb and Diekmann 2005).”
• Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation. (2005, background): “In a study of woodland plants in a slowly changing landscape in the UK, Verheyen et al. (2004) were able to demonstrate clear effects of both woodland area and connectivity on the presence of especially those species with low seed production and predominantly short-range seed dispersal.”