A review of scenario planning
By Muhammad Amer, Tugrul U. Daim, Antonie J. Jetter. 2013
901 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad450aaf200096756634e84549da77c20963ae6a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Marc R Gramberger
- I. Holman
- Martina Flörke
- Jan Sendzimir
- Ilona Bärlund
- Benjamin Stuch
- K. Zellmer
- Kasper Kok
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Marc R Gramberger
- I. Holman
- Martina Flörke
- Jan Sendzimir
- Ilona Bärlund
- Benjamin Stuch
- K. Zellmer
- Klaus Hubacek
Citations in the corpus
- European participatory scenario development: strengthening the link between stories and models (2015, background): “Scenarios come in many shapes and forms (see reviews by e.g. Van Notten et al. 2001; Amer et al. 2013).”
- Development and transport implications of automated vehicles in the Netherlands: scenarios for 2030 and 2050 (2017, methodology): “We apply the long-established intuitive logics scenario development method (see Bradfield et al., 2005, Amer et al., 2013, Wright et al., 2013) to identify plausible future development paths of automated vehicles in the Netherlands and to estimate potential implications for traffic, travel…”
- Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job (2018, background): “Scenario building (or planning, or exploration) (Amer et al., 2013) is a practical approach to dealing with uncertainties about the future.”