Improved measurement of the shape of the electron

By J. Hudson, Dhiren M. Kara, I. Smallman, B. Sauer, M. Tarbutt, E. Hinds. Nature, 2011

670 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The electron is predicted to be slightly aspheric, with a distortion characterized by the electric dipole moment (EDM), de. No experiment has ever detected this deviation. The standard model of particle physics predicts that de is far too small to detect, being some eleven orders of magnitude smaller than the current experimental sensitivity. However, many extensions to the standard model naturally predict much larger values of de that should be detectable. This makes the search for the electron EDM a powerful way to search for new physics and constrain the possible extensions. In particular, the popular idea that new supersymmetric particles may exist at masses of a few hundred GeV/c2 (where c is the speed of light) is difficult to reconcile with the absence of an electron EDM at the present limit of sensitivity. The size of the EDM is also intimately related to the question of why the Universe has so little antimatter. If the reason is that some undiscovered particle interaction breaks the symmetry between matter and antimatter, this should result in a measurable EDM in most models of particle physics. Here we use cold polar molecules to measure the electron EDM at the highest level of precision reported so far, providing a constraint on any possible new interactions. We obtain de = (−2.4 ± 5.7stat ± 1.5syst) × 10−28e cm, where e is the charge on the electron, which sets a new upper limit of |de| < 10.5 × 10−28e cm with 90 per cent confidence. This result, consistent with zero, indicates that the electron is spherical at this improved level of precision. Our measurement of atto-electronvolt energy shifts in a molecule probes new physics at the tera-electronvolt energy scale.

Subfields: Instrumentation, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad0c5db7c0648b106d1c5aefe0e9e8f286cafa38

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Instrumentation

  1. Igor G. Irastorza

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Christophe Grojean
  2. M. Muhlleitner
  3. T. Konstandin
  4. Michael Spira
  5. P. Fierlinger
  6. J. Singh
  7. D. Bodeker
  8. D. Curtin

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. G. Lanfranchi
  2. D. Bodeker
  3. M. Jung
  4. W. Rodejohann
  5. C. Burrage
  6. D. DeMille
  7. C. Clark
  8. Andrei Derevianko

Citations in the corpus