SPECIFICITY IN INDUCED PLANT RESPONSES SHAPES PATTERNS OF HERBIVORE OCCURRENCE ON SOLANUM DULCAMARA

By D. Viswanathan, Anita Narwani, J. Thaler. 2005

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Sequence of arrival determines plant‐mediated interactions between herbivores (2011, background): “Systemic effects following herbivory can have fitness consequences for temporally or spatially separated organisms (van Loon et al. , 1998, Erb et al. , 2009a, Sticher et al. , 1997, Poelman et al. , 2008a, Viswanathan et al. , 2005).”
Metabolomic analysis of the interaction between plants and herbivores (2009, background): “To experimentally assess whether P. rapae caterpillars are able to metabolise CoQAs, they could be fed on an artificial diet spiked with isotope-labeled CoQAs (Webb and Shelton 1988).”
First insights into specificity of belowground tritrophic interactions (2008, unknown): “Specificity of induction can be caused by the type of feeding damage (Takabayashi and Dicke 1996, Stout et al. 1998, Walling 2000), salivary constituents (Turlings et al. 1990, Mattiacci and Dicke 1995, Alborn et al. 1997), and the extent of damage imposed by the herbivore (Karban 1987, Lin et al.…”
Herbivore‐induced plant responses in Brassica oleracea prevail over effects of constitutive resistance and result in enhanced herbivore attack (2010, background): “Such indirect plantmediated interactions between herbivores have been recorded in the field and have been identified between herbivores of the same feeding guild as well as across feeding guilds (Denno et al., 2000; Kessler & Baldwin, 2004; Viswanathan et al., 2005).”