Toxic Talk: How Online Incivility Can Undermine Perceptions of Media

By Ashley A. Anderson, Sara K. Yeo, Dominique Brossard, Dietram A. Scheufele, Michael A. Xenos. 2016

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Communication, Gender Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/acf7bdeb981cd2a4a30762fe4fcd02e1f96a47d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Ashley A. Anderson
2. Heidi E. Huntington

In Communication

1. Ashley A. Anderson
2. Dietram A. Scheufele
3. Nicole M. Krause
4. Heidi E. Huntington
5. Andrew F. Hayes
6. Shirley S. Ho
7. Douglas M. McLeod
8. Brian H. Spitzberg

Citations in the corpus

• Social Media, Science, and Attack Discourse: How Twitter Discussions of Climate Change Use Sarcasm and Incivility (2017, background): “, 2014), it increases narrow-mindedness (Borah, 2013), it develops perceptions of bias in online posts (Anderson et al., 2016), it limits satisfaction with online discussions (Gervais, 2015), and it fosters anger (Gervais, 2017).”
• Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news (2019, background): “Even when the evidence that is being presented in user comments is held constant, however, uncivil comments following a science news article can promote perceptions among readers that the article itself is biased and can polarize readers based on their initial attitudes toward the technology that is”