Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy.

By S. Loeb, A. Vellekoop, Hashim Uddin Ahmed, J. Catto, Mark Emberton, R. Nam, D. Rosario, V. Scattoni, Y. Lotan. European Urology, 2013

1,080 citations recorded by the source corpus.

CONTEXT Prostate biopsy is commonly performed for cancer detection and management. The benefits and risks of prostate biopsy are germane to ongoing debates about prostate cancer screening and treatment. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of complications from prostate biopsy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase, supplemented with additional references. Articles were reviewed for data on the following complications: hematuria, rectal bleeding, hematospermia, infection, pain, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), urinary retention, erectile dysfunction, and mortality. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS After biopsy, hematuria and hematospermia are common but typically mild and self-limiting. Severe rectal bleeding is uncommon. Despite antimicrobial prophylaxis, infectious complications are increasing over time and are the most common reason for hospitalization after biopsy. Pain may occur at several stages of prostate biopsy and can be mitigated by anesthetic agents and anxiety-reduction techniques. Up to 25% of men have transient LUTS after biopsy, and <2% have frank urinary retention, with slightly higher rates reported after transperineal template biopsy. Biopsy-related mortality is rare. CONCLUSIONS Preparation for biopsy should include antimicrobial prophylaxis and pain management. Prostate biopsy is frequently associated with minor bleeding and urinary symptoms that usually do not require intervention. Infectious complications can be serious, requiring prompt management and continued work into preventative strategies.

Subfields: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Rheumatology, Urology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/acf6a7d62f5477e97a945768c02cc85d0a637ab8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

  1. Michel Bolla
  2. N. Mottet
  3. J. Bellmunt
  4. V. Matveev
  5. Steven Joniau
  6. Thomas Wiegel

Citations in the corpus