Fishery policy and job satisfaction in three southeast Asian fisheries

By R. Pollnac, R. Pomeroy, I. Harkes. 2001

261 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Reduction of fishing effort by providing alternative employment for fishers is a frequently mentioned policy option. This option is based on assumptions that fishing is a dirty, hard, undesirable occupation, hence employment of last resort and that fishers are amongst the poorest of the poor; and that the poor care little about the type of job they have as long as they make enough to live. This paper first examines the quality of evidence supporting these assertions. It then analyses primary data concerning aspects of job satisfaction among small-scale fishers in the Philippines, Indonesia and Vietnam. The analyses indicate that most fishers would not leave fishing for an alternative occupation, citing income as well as non-income factors for resisting the change. This leads to the conclusion that the above assumptions are not consistent with either the literature or the current analysis. Hence, fishery policy based on these assumptions or the uninformed sponsorship of alternative employment is likely to fail.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/acf396208a246fd4f5446819c4fad4b8b73a742c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. E. Allison
  2. Sarah Coulthard
  3. Anthony Charles
  4. Christophe Béné

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. E. Allison
  2. Sarah Coulthard
  3. Christophe Béné
  4. Anthony Charles
  5. D. Armitage
  6. Derek Johnson
  7. Fikret Berkes
  8. Romina Rodela

Citations in the corpus