Using inverse methods for estimating soil hydraulic properties from field data as an alternative to direct methods
By A. Ritter, F. Hupet, R. Muñoz‐Carpena, Sébastien Lambot, Marnik Vanclooster. 2003
184 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/acf26c5570f7c892c991b24cae17819bfd3d757b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- Thomas Wöhling
- Jasper A. Vrugt
- C. Regalado
- Sébastien Lambot
- Marnik Vanclooster
- R. Muñoz‐Carpena
- Ming Ye
- H. Dai
In Environmental Engineering
- Thomas Wöhling
- Jasper A. Vrugt
- C. Regalado
- Sébastien Lambot
- Marnik Vanclooster
- R. Muñoz‐Carpena
- Jirka Šimůnek
- Ming Ye
In Soil Science
Citations in the corpus
- Multiresponse multilayer vadose zone model calibration using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation and field water retention data (2011, background): “…hydraulic properties derived from direct methods on small soil samples are not representative for the key hydrological processes at larger spatial scales observed in the field [e.g., Ritter et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2003; Vereecken et al., 2008; Wöhling et al., 2008; Mirus et al., 2009].”
- Analysis of alternative measurement strategies for the inverse optimization of the hydraulic properties of a volcanic soil (2004, methodology): “Ritter et al. / Journal of Hydrology 295 (2004) 124–139 125”