Habitat Use by Female Caribou: Tradeoffs Associated with Parturition

By Neil L. Barten, R. Terry Bowyer, K. Jenkins. 2001

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/acea9204034b3b00dfe477a459ff55d7e29cdbc6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. R. Terry Bowyer
2. J. Kie
3. Terry Bowyer
4. Ryan A. Long
5. S. Hamel
6. K. Monteith
7. B. Pierce
8. V. Bleich

In General Health Professions

1. R. Terry Bowyer

Citations in the corpus

• Habitat use patterns in relation to escape terrain : are alpine ungulate females trading off better foraging sites for safety? (2007, background): “Additionally, we can expect this trade-off to be more important in early lactation when offspring are most vulnerable to predation and depend almost entirely on their mothers’ milk (Barten et al. 2001).”
• Behavior and nutritional condition buffer a large‐bodied endotherm against direct and indirect effects of climate (2014, background): “Key words: biophysical model; Blue Mountains, northeastern Oregon, USA; Cervus elaphus; climate change; elk; nutritional condition; resource selection function; Snake River Plain, southeastern Idaho, USA; thermal environment; thermoregulation.”
• Resource Selection and Movements by Female Mule Deer Odocoileus hemionus: Effects of Reproductive Stage (2009, background): “…example, a positive spatial correlation between risk of predation and forage quality or abundance may necessitate trade-offs between predator avoidance 288 WILDLIFE BIOLOGY 15:3 (2009) and forage acquisition (Bowyer et al. 1998, 1999, Rachlow&Bowyer 1998, Barten et al. 2001, Hamel & Côté 2007).”
• HABITAT SELECTION BY MULE DEER: FORAGE BENEFITS OR RISK OF PREDATION? (2004, background): “This trade-off has been proposed in an array of environments (Sih 1980, Pierce et al. 1992, Rachlow and Bowyer 1998, Barten et al. 2001), but it can occur only if foraging benefits and predation risk are positively correlated (Bowyer et al. 1998).”
• SEXUAL SEGREGATION IN RUMINANTS: DEFINITIONS, HYPOTHESES, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT (2004, background): “Good examples exist in which female ruminants trade off a higher quality diet for greater security from predators during sexual segregation (Barten et al. 2001; Berger 1991; Bleich et al. 1997; Corti and Shackelton 2002; Kie and Bowyer 1999; Rachlow and Bowyer 1998).”
• Climate change and caribou: effects of summer weather on forage (2002, methodology): “), lichens, forbs, and graminoids (Boertje 1984; Barten et al. 2001).”
• Effects of scale on interpreting life‐history characteristics of ungulates and carnivores (2006, background): “…tradeoffs between acquiring forage and risk of predation for large mammals (Festa-Bianchet, 1988; Bleich et al ., 1997; Bowyer et al ., 1998b; Barten et al ., 2001; Corti & Shackelton, 2002; many others), but few have considered how scale might effect such interpretations — an area in dire…”