Anchor, Float or Abandon Ship: Exchange Rate Regimes for Accession Countries

By W. Buiter, C. Grafe. 2002

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/acbf2b40cac984ac554e2061a6099c6ace3def11

Citations in the corpus

• Equilibrium Exchange Rates in Transition Economies: Taking Stock of the Issues (2006, unknown): “44 This is in contrast with the long held view, advocated by Buiter and Grafe (2002) and Szapáry (2003) among others, that new EU member states in Central and Eastern Europe would not be able to fulfill the Maastricht criterion on price stability because of the B-S effect.”
• A meta-analysis of business cycle correlation between the euro area and CEECs: What do we know - and who cares? (2004, unknown): “Similarly, Buiter and Grafe (2002) suggest correlations of inventory changes as a more appropriate indicator of business-cycle correlation than aggregate GDP.”
• The Balassa–Samuelson Effect in Central Europe: A Disaggregated Analysis (2004, unknown): “…the Maastricht ceiling but the inflation differential warranted by the BalassaSamuelson effect was greater than the 1½ percentage point margin (at a given exchange rate and at full capacity), the equilibrium response of the nominal exchange rate would be to appreciate (Buiter and Grafe, 2002).”