Neighbourhood and Community

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups (2013, background): “One of the most consistent results of sociological research is that the ability to monitor and police activities in a neighborhood is at least as important as liking and socializing with one’s neighbors (Sampson, 2004).”
Human prosociality from an evolutionary perspective: variation and correlations at a city-wide scale ☆ (2009, background): “Unsurprisingly for such a large literature, the concept of social capital has become elaborated in a number of ways, including a distinction between bridging vs. bonding social capital (Putnam, 2000), and collective efficacy (Sampson, 2004).”
Neighborhood Effects on Economic Self‐Sufficiency: A Reconsideration of the Moving to Opportunity Experiment1 (2008, unknown): “…to workers, as predicted by network models (Wilson 1996); the lack of public trust and collective efficacy, as predicted by social capital models (Sampson 2004); the spatial isolation from jobs and resources, as predicted by the mismatch hypothesis (Kain 1968); or the side effects of…”
Formative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-regulated Learning (2012, background): “…and support learning through the co-construction of more powerful meta-cognitive strategies (Bandura 1986, 1994, 1997; Zimmerman and Pons 1986; Frederiksen and Collins 1989; Butler and Winne 1995; Zimmerman 2000; Brophy 2004; Sampson 2004; Harlen 2006; Black and Wiliam 1998a, b, 2006, 2009).”